For Reuters, Frank Scheck writes that "The show did seem to please the audience, and there might be enough Jersey tourists who will be delighted at its gentle sending up of their home state. But "The Wedding Singer" seems unlikely to provide New Line Cinema with another screen-to-stage-to-screen transformation a la its hugely successful "Hairspray."
Howard Kissel in The Daily News writes that "When the curtain goes up on the musical version of "The Wedding Singer," the stage rocks with energy. The large cast - garishly dressed, even though many of them are wearing the most inoffensive of colors, yellow - are wedding guests singing an infectious song called "It's Your Wedding Day." They're dancing jerkily in a witty parody of '80s steps. For about 10 minutes, you have the feeling it's going to be an evening of fun. Then suddenly the mood quiets down. It never quite reaches that level of excitement again. What could have gone wrong, you wonder. And then you realize, this is a musical version of a mediocre film - how good could it be?"
For the Associated Press, Michael Kuchwara writes that " Brought to Broadway by the same producing team that gave us "Hairspray," the show, which opened Thursday at the Al Hirschfeld Theatre, is, unfortunately, more relentless than inspired. All the ingredients, particularly a promising score by Matthew Sklar and Chad Beguelin, seem to be in place. So why doesn't "The Wedding Singer" deliver a bigger kick, transporting us to that electric if rarified world of musical-theater bliss? For one thing, the musical seems to be over-enamored of its own concept -- obsessively referencing the decade in which it is set when time might better be spent fleshing out the people on stage."
|
|